ACM ICPC Live Archive 3902

-

ACM ICPC Live Archive 3902

Problem Statement

Wrong:

Take the root, S, and use Dijkstra's to try to find the shortest path between S and every other leaf. Once an optimal new server is found, repeat the process, but with both S and the new server. Keep adding new servers until the distance is less than or equal to K.

Notice that for one thing, this is immensely inefficient in terms of time. It is repeating repeating Dijkstra's. So no.
Furthermore, this will not create the most optimal node set. What if the range of one of these new servers overlap with the range of one of the old servers?
Lastly, this is complicated beyond need. The following method is simpler:

Analysis

The "network" is an acylic graph. However, by marking a node, S, on the graph, as a "propagation center", i.e. root, it effectively becomes an directed acylic graph, which can be reorganized into a tree.
Notice that the network is an acylic graph. Normally, acyclic graphs don't come by themselves, they often have a root and can be organized into trees.
After organization, it is much easier to do searches (in this case, DFS) on the network.

Two DFS have to be done.
The initial DFS tracks each leaf of the network (i.e. clients). This then stores them by height. Furthermore, this tracks each node's parent in the network.
The second DFS does "propogation" from a certain node that we need to add a server in, and sees how many nodes this covers.

To count how many nodes we need in total, count backwards from N-1 to K. We see how many leafs are of distance N-1 to S, take the first one,"rewind" using the stored parents, and put a server there. Then, do the second DFS to see how many nodes are "covered".
Repeat this until all nodes of distance N-1 is done. If a node is already "covered", skip it.
Repeat for all distances up to K.

Code

#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <cstring>
#define MAXN 1005
using namespace std; 

int p[MAXN], N, S, K;
bool v[MAXN];
vector<int> elist[MAXN], leafs[MAXN];

void dfsA(int i, int f, int d)
{
    p[i] = f;
    if(elist[i].size() == 1 && d > K) leafs[d].push_back(i);
    for(int c:elist[i]) if(c != f) dfsA(c, i, d+1);
}

void dfsB(int i, int f, int d)
{
    if(d > K) return;
    v[i] = true;
    for(int c:elist[i]) if(c != f) dfsB(c, i, d+1);
}

int main()
{
    ios_base::sync_with_stdio(false); cin.tie(nullptr);
    int tcn; cin >> tcn;
    while(tcn--)
    {
        memset(p, 255, sizeof p); memset(v, 0, sizeof v);
        for(int i=0; i<MAXN; i++) { elist[i].clear(); leafs[i].clear(); }
        cin >> N >> S >> K;
        for(int i=0; i<N-1; i++)
        {
            int s, e; cin >> s >> e;
            elist[s].push_back(e);
            elist[e].push_back(s);
        }
        dfsA(S, -1, 0);
        int ans = 0;
        for(int d=N-1; d>K; d--)
            for(int i:leafs[d])
            {
                if(v[i]) continue;
                int f=i; for(int j=0; j<K; j++) f=p[f];
                dfsB(f, -1, 0);
                ans++;
            }
        cout << ans << endl;
    }
}

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

USACO Training "subset": Subset Sums

-
USACO Training "subset": Subset Sums Problem Statement Subset Sums JRM For many sets of consecutive integers from 1 through N (1 <= N <= 39), one can partition the set into two sets whose sums are identical. For example, if N=3, one can partition the set {1, 2, 3} in one way so that the sums of both subsets are identical: {3} and {1,2} This counts as a single partitioning (i.e., reversing the order counts as the same partitioning and thus does not increase the count of partitions). If N=7, there are four ways to partition the set {1, 2, 3, ... 7} so that each partition has the same sum: {1,6,7} and {2,3,4,5} {2,5,7} and {1,3,4,6} {3,4,7} and {1,2,5,6} {1,2,4,7} and {3,5,6} Given N, your program should print the number of ways a set containing the integers from 1 through N can be partitioned into two sets whose sums are identical. Print 0 if there are no such ways. Your program must calculate the answer, not look it up from a table. PROGRAM NAME: s
Read more

USACO 2018 Open: Talent Show

-
Image
USACO 2018 Open Talent Show In Short Given N objects with value Vi and weight Wi, a collection of elements is said to have total value-to-weight ratio as (the sum of their value) divided by (the sum of their weight). Find the best possible value-to-weight ratio of these X objects, given the restraint that the collection must have total weight at least W. Return that ratio multiplied by 1000 and floored. Analysis It would be very difficult to calculate this optimal ratio - we'd have to either try all possible collections - O(2^n), where n is at most 250, about 10 to the power of 75 calculations, OR use a greedy heuristic - get the objects with the best ratio until it satisfies the weight limit. Neither of those are too to our liking, so how about searching for it? The search space is linear and not infinite - it asks for the ratio to the closest thousandths. The search space is sorted as well - if ratio X is achievable, then ratio Y < X is also achievable, if
Read more

OpenJudge 1768: Kadane's Algorithm on 2D Arrays

-
OpenJudge 1768: Kadane's Algorithm on 2-D Arrays Simple Version Given a 2-D matrix of integers, find the sub-matrix of this whose sum is maximized, and find that sum. The size of the matrix is no larger than 100 by 100. Analysis O(N^4) - Works, but naive     That's true, an naive O(N^4) version would work. We simply need to calculate (two dimensional!) prefix sums first. A quick review to what 2-D prefix sums are:     The 2-D prefix sum of two coordinates, X and Y, is the sum of all elements that have X-coordinate less than or equal to X, and Y coordinate less than or equal to Y.     It can be calculated through tabulation by removing overlapping areas.     Let P be the prefix sum array and V be the array of values, so the formula is as follows:     P[x, y] = V[x, y] - P[x-1, y] - P[x, y-1] + P[x-1, y-1].     We need to add the P[x-1, y-1] at the end since subtracting P[x-1, y] and P[x, y-1] we had overlapped the P[x-1, y-1]. Then, all we need to
Read more